39 Comments
User's avatar
Elizabeth Fowler's avatar

Truth Alliance is finding significant irregularities in swing state vote counts. Pennsylvania needs a hand recount ofa at a minimum 3 counties.

Expand full comment
Mika Anderson's avatar

It's called ELECTION TRUTH ALLIANCE and yes they're doing massive audits and have found a ton of fraudulent activity. It's freaking crazy!!

Expand full comment
zph's avatar

Two of those three counties are Democrat essentially Democrat controlled and the third, Erie, Trump barely won. So yes, the irregularities point towards shenanigans by Dems.

Expand full comment
New Bee's avatar

Why/how could there be more ballots than voters? Is there a theory you can share for what may have caused this? Is there no way to match the ballots to the voters and see who belongs to the 16 "extra" ballots?

Expand full comment
SMART Elections's avatar

We will be posting about this all week. There is a lot more to reveal. Thank you for your interest.

Expand full comment
zph's avatar

Read many of these other comments here. So many of your prog commenters are clueless and even make up absurd stories about tech that they obviously know nothing about.

Expand full comment
Ed Spire's avatar

When a scanner is replaced the data chip from the old scanner should be moved to the new one. If done then the new scanner will start with the same public counter that the old one had. And the scanner is to be placed on the original ballot box. Clearly that didn’t happen, and the counts for scanner B cannot be trusted at all. This calls for a hand recount for that scanner.

Expand full comment
Christy's avatar

That and there were 3 B scanners??? 🤷🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment
Ed Spire's avatar

Could be. Equipment can fail. Election judges with minimal experience sometime do not understand how to properly implement a replacement. And training election judges is hard. There are thousands of them. Who can really spend enough money to fully train them all? (Um... nobody)

Typically, there are three levels of training - the "grunt" election judge, who checks in voters and helps them vote, hopefully a trained equipment manager in each precinct who can help with first level equipment problems, and then a roving field tech (me) who can back them up and help solve harder technical problems.

When a scanner fails, it's mostly the rover that puts things right. But if they are short-handed and the local the precinct equipment manager has to handle it, I would not be in the least surprised to find them getting it wrong, and ending up with two broken scanners and one working one, all on separate ballot boxes.

Please - volunteer to come help us - become an election judge, or if you have a mechanical aptitude, a precinct equipment manager.

We need all the help we can get to run this democracy.

Especially now.

Expand full comment
Ghost Of WU's avatar

Elon used usbs to gain internet access to the tabulators. Russia called bomb threats and closed the poll locations to allow access to Elons hackers. They manipulated the votes and changed Kamala’s vote to Trump’s. Look up Election Truth Alliance on YouTube. All the charts and changed votes are visible. So much proof. They will come with a lawsuit soon.

Expand full comment
Chris Bystroff's avatar

will the lawsuit lead to a hand recount? if successful?

Expand full comment
Karla Kemp's avatar

You need to make some form of effort. If you had read this you wouldn't be asking that question.

Expand full comment
New Bee's avatar

I did read it. This was weeks ago. I received a response from Lulu that there would be more information.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

The only scenario I can think of is that when scanner B stared to fail, a voter and election support people didn't think the scanner scanned the vote card correctly and mistakenly fed the card through a second time. Unless each card has a unique barcode and the scanner detects a card being fed through twice, I could see this happening.

Expand full comment
Brenda Streed's avatar

Or another scenario could be that someone less innocent took extra paper ballots and scanned them. This should be caught by the comparison of the number of paper ballots remaining to the total protective count.

Expand full comment
susan eustis's avatar

Lulu I ocncur, having worked in elections for over 68 years. I know the value fo theprotective and the public counter. I know that thelaws require these protections of ballot security. I have reached out to you and would like a response

Expand full comment
SMART Elections's avatar

Emailed you. Thanks for your outreach.

Expand full comment
Fed Up With Fraud's avatar

I wish you the luck 🍀 and thank you for your diligence and perseverance. Every vote matters. Cheating and voter manipulation is every one’s business.

Expand full comment
Ghost Of WU's avatar

Not only that look at #ElectionTruthAlliance on YouTube. All the proof is there. They highly manipulated Nevada, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Alabama and down ballot for MTGreene. All swing states. It’s statistically impossible for Trump to have won every one. They manipulated tabulators and allowed access with bomb threats from Russia to polls. Look it up.. Kamala won. I’m fucking mad they stole our elections. They should never get out if jail..

Expand full comment
Fed Up With Fraud's avatar

These people protect democracy at the roots. They deserve our support and respect ✊🏽

Expand full comment
Fed Up With Fraud's avatar

Getting to the absolute bottom of this problem and understanding what is happening is the only cure and/or prevention of fraud in elections.

Expand full comment
WildWestLeft's avatar

The elections need audit!

Expand full comment
Chris Bystroff's avatar

yes they need audits. but it is too easy to corrupt the audit process in NY. Election law needs an overhaul.

Expand full comment
Katy Sheridan's avatar

Thank you for sharing this! It is so important!

Expand full comment
susan eustis's avatar

I did not see the email. I lead the Government Blockchain Association GBA voting working group out of DC.

Expand full comment
Navy Vet ET2's avatar

I looking at the documents at the top one is dated 6/23/24 and then on the left side margin it say 6/15/24. So how can you compare different days as an error they would not agree.

Expand full comment
Jay Thomas's avatar

The vast number of mathematical anomalies, the sheer level of statistical improbabilities would lead anybody with two firing neurons still left in their brain to know something transpired. Please don't let me go through the very long list of things that don't make sense from the rallies to the record lines and turnouts across the nation and yet overall less people voted.

Expand full comment
Mary Sharum's avatar

Yes, get the visuals of this out there. The visual proof needs to be totally visible.

Expand full comment
BoboBodkin's avatar

It looks like 2024, next question.

Expand full comment
Thomas Goodfellow's avatar

Did all the election workers who are registered in the district vote and sign in?

Expand full comment
Aileen's avatar

Will this be investigated?

Expand full comment
TMFD's avatar

Note- You can have more ballots than voters. It is called a spoiled ballot. They get identified, and every ballot that is used must be accounted for. That does not mean that every ballot accounted for was counted towards one candidate or issue in a given election. Now, that said, this story is riddled with misinformation. I also call bullshit on the referenced photos because there are no records of any elections on the date indicated in any state, according to Politico.

Expand full comment