That's some nice anecdotal evidence you have there. I have seen many, many people saying they know Republicans that did vote for Harris. I've even seen some counties where not ONE crossover ballot (meaning R down-ballot, Harris for President) was counted...while residents of that county spoke up saying their own ballot should have been a…
That's some nice anecdotal evidence you have there. I have seen many, many people saying they know Republicans that did vote for Harris. I've even seen some counties where not ONE crossover ballot (meaning R down-ballot, Harris for President) was counted...while residents of that county spoke up saying their own ballot should have been a crossover.
There, now we've both presented anecdotal evidence on both sides. It's a draw. Care to engage with the statistical data presented here?
Thats nice, but not enough never Trump Republicans to overcome the uncommitted movement, clearly, as the down ballot split suggests. More Democratic leaning voters did vote it appears, just not for the terrible candidate that was forced upon them. The statistics show more voters are registering as independents and willing to split their tickets than in the past. This appearing across almost every county in every state despite differences in process and procedure is more indicative of a general tendency in the way people voted than mass election fraud.
Of course, I can’t rule out the possibility of fraud now as I couldn’t in 2020. Both parties are capable of playing dirty, and both do every election. I just can’t make that determination from stats alone. The stats are neutral. There would have to be an actual investigation, recounts, etc., but thats not in the interest of the two parties who may not want their dirty tricks to be revealed.
What I see though are claims of fraud and the denial of those claims as being plainly partisan. It’s not lost on people who vehemently denied fraud in 2020 that they look like total hypocrites for claiming it now. They also were fully supportive of the social media crackdown on fraud claims in 2020, but now thats a bad thing when it’s your chosen candidate who may be at the receiving end of potential fraud. Funny the author thinks the removal of fact checking is bad for them, as if the fact checkers would take up their narrative position.
That's some nice anecdotal evidence you have there. I have seen many, many people saying they know Republicans that did vote for Harris. I've even seen some counties where not ONE crossover ballot (meaning R down-ballot, Harris for President) was counted...while residents of that county spoke up saying their own ballot should have been a crossover.
There, now we've both presented anecdotal evidence on both sides. It's a draw. Care to engage with the statistical data presented here?
Thats nice, but not enough never Trump Republicans to overcome the uncommitted movement, clearly, as the down ballot split suggests. More Democratic leaning voters did vote it appears, just not for the terrible candidate that was forced upon them. The statistics show more voters are registering as independents and willing to split their tickets than in the past. This appearing across almost every county in every state despite differences in process and procedure is more indicative of a general tendency in the way people voted than mass election fraud.
Of course, I can’t rule out the possibility of fraud now as I couldn’t in 2020. Both parties are capable of playing dirty, and both do every election. I just can’t make that determination from stats alone. The stats are neutral. There would have to be an actual investigation, recounts, etc., but thats not in the interest of the two parties who may not want their dirty tricks to be revealed.
What I see though are claims of fraud and the denial of those claims as being plainly partisan. It’s not lost on people who vehemently denied fraud in 2020 that they look like total hypocrites for claiming it now. They also were fully supportive of the social media crackdown on fraud claims in 2020, but now thats a bad thing when it’s your chosen candidate who may be at the receiving end of potential fraud. Funny the author thinks the removal of fact checking is bad for them, as if the fact checkers would take up their narrative position.
Try this 2024 election analysis.
https://electiontruthalliance.org/about-us